![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() | |
| Post Your Pain | |
| Post Your Problem | |
| Laughing All the Way | |
| Hall of Shame | |
| History Lesson | |
| Help is Here! | |
| Success Stories | |
| Public Statement | |
| Contact Us | |
| Home | |
|
UPDATE 2/04/01 A. Latest on
Lawsuits
The first small battle took place
recently in New York when Verizon tried to have the first of three class
actions dismissed. Their arguement was that the stipulations in the
contract agreement should protect them against this type of legal
action.
Well, the public doesn't buy it
and neither did the judge. After denying the request, Verizon has
decided to appeal it. The good news is that typically, most appeals
fail.
As mentioned previously, this
process is very slow, however it is an auspicious beginning.
B. Wireless
Issue
In yet another display of hubris,
Verizon decided to try and get away with quite the scheme involving their
wireless service to New England customers.
Even though customers had signed 2
year contracts that stated their peak/off-peak phone times, Verizon
recently tried to change it by pushing peak times from 8pm to 9pm.
Their arguement? "We looked at our billing system and we found it
wasn't able to support peak and off-peak times for different
people.'' Funny how that system has functioned just fine up until
now! My question to them would also be, why not bring all the
off-peak times down to 8pm? Just wouldn't want to give back to the
customer, now would we?
The contract stipulates that if
Verizon makes a change in the terms of the contract that adversely
affect a customer, the customer may terminate the contract without a
termination fee. The most amazing part is that they would not honor
this, and instead decided to only allow those who could prove that the
change would adversely them could terminate their agreement. Will
wonders never cease, I ask you? Take a look at a response (from
Verizon) after a consumer tried to cancel their service. Read it
straight through and you'll be shaking your head just like
me:
Needless to say there was quite
the backlash as both customers and legal entities pursued the matter,
forcing Verizon to back down on this. Funny how in light of all this
pressure, their billing system is now able to handle the difference
between peak/off-peak rates! You can read both chapters
here:
C. Changes to
Verizonpathetic.com
If you have visited the website
recently, you will notice a few changes to the site. Before, most of
the links were associated with the Bell Atlantic portion of what is now
Verizon. Currently it refers only to Verizon. The site can
also be accessed via both http://www.bellatlanticpathetic.com and http://www.verizonpathetic.com
D. Anti-Trust
Action
Now that phase one is complete
(educating consumers, class action suits initated, etc.), phase two is
being put into motion. Even if all three suits were to be
successful, this would not necessarily mean more choices for consumers or
improved service.
Competitors have voiced their
frustration at losing customers due to Verizon's ineptness and
excessive delays in converting new accounts. Some have not been able
to remain in business, citing Verizon as a major obstacle.
Therefore, a new link to verizonpathetic.com is, "Can you say
MONOPOLY". This link has been made in an effort to gather together
telecom's who have faced VZ's discriminatory practices. Please
pass this information on to your own ISP. Like the consumers who
have banded together here and are making an impact, smaller telecom's will
now get their chance.
E. Massachusetts
Long Distance
In Massachusetts, Verizon has been
trying in vain to offer long distance service. To do so, they must
first satisfy various criteria to the FCC including that there
is local competition in the DSL market. After one failed attempt,
they plan on going for it again. In light of their latest escapades,
it looks as if it will end up being yet another embarassing moment for
them. Verizonpathetic.com obtained a copy of a press release that
was issued to The Boston Herald regarding the situation. It makes
for some interesting reading...
|